The Return of the Personal Ad — A Four-Part Series
Part I of IVOn March 22, 2018, Craigslist took its Personals section offline. The announcement was terse, and oddly tender. Coverage at the time understood it as more than a product change.
On March 22, 2018, Craigslist posted a notice where its Personals section used to be. It was seven sentences. The last one read: “To the millions of spouses, partners, and couples who met through craigslist, we wish you every happiness!”
The legislation, FOSTA — the Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act — had passed the House 388–25 and the Senate 97–2. Craigslist acted before Trump had even signed it. The personals section, all of it, was gone by that morning.
Craigslist Personals had been running since 1995. At its peak it covered dozens of categories: men seeking women, women seeking men, men seeking men, women seeking women, couples seeking others, and missed connections — ads from people who had seen a stranger and wanted a second chance. There was also a strictly platonic section for people who just wanted company.
The text was the whole thing. No profile picture drove the first impression. No algorithm sorted the results. You read what someone had written and decided from that whether to respond.
For queer users in particular, this mattered. The semi-anonymous, text-first format allowed people to be specific about what they wanted without attaching a face to their desire — useful for anyone for whom visibility carried risk.
Gizmodo identified something the political debate had mostly missed: FOSTA imposed the same legal liability on every platform, but not every platform had the same ability to absorb it. Large companies had lawyers and compliance budgets. Craigslist, which ran lean by design, didn’t.
The ordinary users of the personals section — people looking for a date, a missed connection, a strictly platonic companion — bore the cost of a law aimed at a different problem entirely.
Personal ads predate Craigslist by centuries. English newspapers carried matrimonial notices early on. By the mid-20th century they were mainstream. In America, the alternative weekly press made them a familiar part of urban life.
The Village Voice, founded in New York in 1955, ran personals sections that became local texts of their own — windows into what a city’s people actually wanted that no other section of the paper could provide. By the 1970s and 1980s, alt-weeklies across the country had personals sections that were community services as much as revenue lines.
Craigslist, modeled on the alt-weekly classified format, launched in San Francisco in 1995. It removed the per-word cost, loosened the geographic limits, and brought that style of ad online at national scale. The reach was new. The underlying idea was not.
By the time Craigslist shut its personals section, the appetite for text-first connection had already found another home. Since 2017, Kelly Rakowski had been running @Personals, an Instagram account for LGBTQ+ personal ads, inspired by the personals sections of queer magazines from the 1980s. It had grown to over 60,000 followers.
By 2019, the first clear revival pieces were already appearing. The Guardian wrote that personal dating ads were “making a comeback,” and that same month Rakowski’s team launched Lex: text-only, no photos on posts, and openly in the newspaper-personals tradition.
Meanwhile, The Cut — New York Magazine’s women- and culture-focused publication — launched a personal ads newsletter called Personals, edited by senior editor Amy Rose Spiegel. A mainstream magazine was running a personals section. The form had not died. It had migrated.
By early 2023, Pew Research found that about three-in-ten U.S. adults had ever used a dating site or app. The mainstream market was enormous. The text-first corner of it had no major home. That gap is what Part II traces.